Business chatbots
Assistants grounded in your own documentation, that hand over to a person when they reach the edge of what they know.
AI automation — Nepal
Chatbots, workflow automation and AI agents built on top of the processes you already run. We start by mapping the work — automating a broken process only makes it fail faster.

What we build
Automation pays off on work that is repetitive, high-volume and rule-shaped. We will tell you when a task is none of those.
Assistants grounded in your own documentation, that hand over to a person when they reach the edge of what they know.
Event-triggered pipelines connecting the tools you already use, so routine handoffs stop depending on someone remembering.
Record syncing, deduplication and lead routing, with the matching rules written down rather than buried in a tool.
Lifecycle email, engagement scoring and behaviour-triggered follow-up, built on your existing data.
Multi-step agents for tasks too open-ended to script. We are candid about which tasks genuinely need one and which do not.
Triage, tagging and drafted replies, with confidence thresholds that route uncertain cases to your team.
Extracting structured data from invoices, forms and contracts, with validation before anything is written downstream.
Search and question answering over your own knowledge base, so staff stop hunting through shared drives.
The connective work — webhooks, queues and retries — that decides whether an automation survives contact with real volume.
Process
Most failed AI projects were technically fine. They automated a process nobody had mapped, or shipped without a plan for what happens when the model is wrong.
We sit with the people doing the work and document what actually happens, including the exceptions that never made it into the official process.
Which steps are repetitive and rule-shaped enough to automate, and which depend on judgement that should stay with a person.
The workflow, the data it touches, where a model is genuinely needed, and what happens on every failure path.
Pipelines, prompts and integrations built against your real data, with logging from the first day rather than added later.
Connecting the CRM, inbox, database or ticketing system the workflow depends on, including the retry and queueing behaviour.
Run against historical cases, measure where output is wrong, and set confidence thresholds for what escalates to a human.
Released behind review steps first, widening automation only as accuracy on your own cases justifies it.
Accuracy, cost per run and escalation rate tracked over time. Model behaviour drifts, and providers change models underneath you.
The stack
We deliberately do not advertise specific model versions here — they change every few months, and the right one depends on your accuracy, latency and cost constraints. We will recommend a current model during scoping.
We are not tied to one provider, and we re-evaluate as new models ship.
For workflows that do not warrant custom code.
Where the logic, state and retrieval live.
Chosen to match your existing hosting rather than ours.
Governance
Any honest account of AI automation starts here. The question is not whether a model will produce a wrong answer, but whether your workflow notices and what it does next. That is a design decision, and we treat it as one.
What may be sent to a third-party model, what must stay internal, and what needs an on-premise or self-hosted option — decided before the build, not after.
Credentials held in a secret store rather than in workflow definitions, and API access scoped to the minimum each step needs.
Inputs, outputs, model version and cost recorded per run, so an incorrect result can be traced rather than guessed at.
Built into every workflow
These are not optional extras quoted separately. An automation without them is not finished work.
Low-certainty cases route to a person
Human sign-off before irreversible actions
Hard ceilings so a loop cannot run away
A known path when the provider fails
Pricing
Build cost depends on the process, connected systems, data sensitivity, review steps and testing required. Model usage is billed by the provider to your account; we provide a written estimate after mapping the workflow.
For a first automation — usually inbound enquiries, lead routing or a support assistant.
For teams automating a chain of steps across more than one department.
For agent systems, self-hosted models or automation touching regulated data.
Working together
We do not publish anonymous quotes or invented efficiency figures. These are the standards we hold ourselves to on every automation instead.
You get the documented workflow whether or not you proceed with the build. It is useful on its own, and it is what the quote is based on.
We test against your historical cases and report where the system is wrong, rather than quoting a benchmark from somewhere else.
API keys, usage history and logs sit in accounts you own. Model spend is billed to you directly and never marked up.
If mapping shows the process is not worth automating, or is not stable enough yet, we will say so rather than build it anyway.
Questions
Start here
Send the details below to open a pre-filled email. You can also reach us directly at info@softhimalaya.com.